Thoughts Along The Journey

Listening to a webinar the other day on leading global virtual teams (www.ecornell.com/june16archive), I was struck by the timeliness of the presenter’s comments when he said, “Trust is the glue of the global workplace.”  As we have walked through this idea of community, we have been asking one another what elements are part of how that community should function.  Yet, somehow deep in hearts we know that community is tenuous (if not impossible) without trust.  

Right there is the start of so many critical questions: what is trust?  How would we describe it or define it?  How does it work out in community? 

Now here’s where the presenter in this webinar caught me by surprise.  Noting that trust was the “glue of the global workplace,” he defined trust in this way: “the willingness to make oneself vulnerable to another.”  I would not have written the definition in this way.  My definition would have tilted more towards “me” and how I could have confidence in another; what are the factors that would make me more likely to put my faith in another person.  Then the proverbial snowball  began to gain speed as I thought of so many biblical illustrations or texts like the one in 1 Corinthians 13:7, where the apostle Paul writes: “[Love] bears (or puts up with) all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.”  Our offer of trust flows out of the reality that Jesus made Himself vulnerable for us, so that through His sacrifice and love we might make ourselves vulnerable to others.

Often people tell me that “trust needs to be earned.”  While I certainly agree with that statement, I’m wondering if there is not a sense in which our community needs to practice what this presenter called “swift trust”.  “Swift trust” would mean that we start by assuming that others are worthy of trust (by that offer, we actually make ourselves vulnerable to both joy and disappointment), and then look for indicators that would validate that trust.  So, how might this change our experience of community together?

Filed under: Community | 3 Comments »

In French, we use the word, “bis”, when we want to come back to something.  It’s kind of like the word, “encore”, in English.  So, I would like to come back to the topic of other-centeredness and raise another question in light of what we have been talking about.  How would other-centeredness work itself out in community through accountability? 

Accountability is not about reporting to someone or ensuring that you can justify the use of every minute of your day.  Being accountable to another in community is about opening oneself to allow someone to ask questions, hard questions like:  what is really going on in your life and ministry these days?  Or, what kept you from carrying out or finishing this task you agreed to do?  It’s about asking another to help you in your growth and development both in life and ministry.  It’s about having someone follow up with you to ensure that tasks you agreed to accomplish are carried out, and that your engagement/participation in the community continues to grow and deepen, not wane.

I know that there are some who have had bad experiences with being accountable to another.  However, we should ask ourselves as to whether accountability is a biblical principle or not?  In other words, does the Bible actually teach us to be accountable to one another?  If it does (and I think texts such as Acts 21:17-20, Romans 14, and 1 Timothy 3 would lead us to see that yes it does), then what form might this biblical function take in OUR community?  What part do I need to play to further build our community through being accountable to others and holding others accountable to what God is calling us to be and to do together?

Filed under: Community | 3 Comments »

This whole issue of community, what it is and what it involves, touched a chord in many.  A number of you posted comments on this blog while others wrote directly to me to share their thoughts. These are the questions many of us are asking ourselves.   In his classic work, Life Together, Dietrich Bonhoeffer described community in this way: “…without Christ we would not know other Christians around us; nor could we approach them. The way to them is blocked by our own ‘I’. Christ opened up the way to God and to one another. Now Christians can live with each other in peace; they can love and serve one another; they can become one.”  Other centeredness, then, characterizes community in its essence as it reflects the One who brought us into community with one another through His sacrifice.

Yet, each time we try to describe or further define community, we find ourselves bumping up against the very values and ethos that we know should characterize our life together, but which we struggle to live out.  We know that community is much more than simply spending time with one another, and we long to experience true community with others, with those who are in ministry together with us. 

What might some of those descriptors be that would characterize true community for us?  Would the list at least include: love, communication, trust, accountability or self-awareness?  Certainly there are others, but the hard part comes when we try to more fully describe what we mean and how it would look for our community to live this way.  Take self-awareness, for example.  Self-awareness is the capacity to see one’s own need for the Gospel and for further growth in relation to God, self and other team members.  Someone who is self-aware understands how others are “receiving” or experiencing them.  He/she seeks the insight and help of others in his/her community to gain this understanding and determine further ways to grow in community.   To get even more pratical about self-awareness, why not ask two or three people in your community this question: if you could change one thing about me, what would it be?

Filed under: Community | 8 Comments »

This past weekend, I spent some time reflecting further on the comment I made at the end of my last post: “Living out of weakness … would at the very least call us to lay aside our self centered desires in order to work in community with others.”  We used to describe this idea of community by talking about “teams” and the importance of being on a team where we could learn, share, pray and work together.  However, we discovered over the years that working on a team was something other than just being in close geographical proximity to one another.  The concept of “team” then morphed into our value of interdependence as we wanted to underscore the broader implications of “team” in terms of its participants and its process.  I then entered another word into the discussion, “community” as I have sought to give voice to the idea that relationships with one another should in many ways reflect the community that exists between the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, that is, that community places team and interdependence back in its biblical context. 

Yet, here’s my dilemma.  For all our efforts to re-define our value of team through interdependence and community, it feels like we are less connected with one another than before.  Many are doing good ministry work, but few are those who have others in their “community” who regularly review with them their ministry and life priorities or who ask the hard questions that we need to be asked.  Noah H. put it well in replying to my most recent post when he wrote: “We need others to communicate with us when we appear to be grasping for privilege and power at the expense of our brothers and sisters.  We need each other to foster this “weakness strength”.”  We need others to speak into our lives, to graciously question what we are doing with our time and our energies.  Let’s pursue real community, not pseudo community.

Filed under: Community | 6 Comments »