I used to tell our kids that every philosophical question should be answered by a “yes” and a “no”. What I meant by that is that you had to approach such questions from multiple perspectives. Shouldn’t it be the same when we talk about innovation? I am often very good about arguing or looking at an issue or a problem from one perspective, but struggle to be able to examine the same issue or problem from other perspectives. Often people will say to me (and I find myself saying the very same thing as well) that we need to “think outside the box”. By that, we imply that what we are currently doing represents “in the box thinking”. It’s actually answering the question by choosing only one response.
In my experienc, it’s just hard to do both. It’s hard to free ourselves and others to creatively imagine new approaches to ministry needs (for example, discipling, mobilizing new workers, or engaging those who come for 1-3 months of ministry) all the while working in a defined framework of guiding principles and strong community. It is thinking “in the box” and thinking “out of the box”. The sandbox metaphor used by T.J. Addington in his book, Leading from the Sandbox is one effort to try and capture this idea.
If I fail to think both “in the box” and “out of the box”, I may find myself:
- Proposing innovative ideas, but being “closed” to the input of others in my community which would refine and improve those ideas;
- Arguing against changing certain structures of ministry because it might challenge what I “know” as life and ministry right now; or
- Working as if no one else is in the “sandbox” with me, and missing the fruit of interdependence (or the gift of accountability) which would allow me to grow further in my journey with Christ.
I can get stuck very easily in one type of thinking, but then again, that’s why I need community; that’s why we need community.
Filed under: Innovation | 2 Comments »
