Decision making may not be an easy science, but we can grow in our competence in regards to the various decision making approaches. Several of you suggested tools that are available to help us get needed training in the different ways to process decisions in groups or individually. The real sticking point, however, comes when we start talking about the context or the atmosphere in which decisions are made, particularly when a decision is made where one doesn’t have a ‘vote’.
Trust has a major bearing on the context created. Trust means that I give or grant you the right to influence my life and work. I don’t do that quickly necessarily, but once I give you my trust, I know that you will act with my best interests in mind.
However, because we are often more self sufficient than other centred, we can chafe under decisions made by others. We don’t like it when others ‘make decisions for us’ or ‘in our place’. Our words and thoughts at that moment often communicate that my world is no larger than myself; that though I may speak about accountability, I am ultimately believe I am accountable to myself alone.
This stance runs counter to the biblical call to community. Yes, community implies sharing of tasks and responsibilities. However, it also implies that others may be making decisions for the group because group members have chosen to ‘trust’ that person to lead the group well.
When we ‘miss’ trust, we can end up doing everything ourselves. We can hold back from sharing responsibilities with others. We can become islands unto ourselves that ‘bump’ into each other at meetings rather than deeply intersect with one another’s lives.
Trust takes time to build, but it begins when we simply say to another: “I trust you. I know you have my best interests in mind. I will be a Christ like follower, bringing my best part to the work of this group.”
Filed under: Community, Trust | 2 Comments »





